Cafe Scientifique

You are cordially invited to come and chat with a scientist about an
interesting and/or controversial science topic. Patterned after
the
International
Cafe Scientifique, the Science Department has initiated an outreach
program to promote public interest in science.
Our goal is simply to have regularly scheduled sessions for informal
discussions of scientific topics.
The LCC Science Department will present the next
Café Scientifique event on Tuesday, December 16, 2008
at 7:30pm
at Schuler Books and Music in the
Eastwood Towne Center.
The topic of conversation will be:
"Cloning: From Frogs to Humans?"
A little more than a decade ago, Dolly the cloned sheep
made world wide head lines. However, she was not the first cloned organism. We
will discuss the long and controversial history of cloning and what our current
technology can do. Can we clone a dinosaur, as in Jurassic Park? Can we clone a
dead cat? Can we clone a human? Should human cloning be allowed? *Note:
Beginning in January 2009, Café
Scientifique will begin at
7:00pm
rather than 7:30pm.
"Nuclear
Power: A Precarious or a Plausible Source of Energy" Previous topics have included:
Upcoming topics:
January 20, 2008 at
7:00pm
Schuler Books & Music, Eastwood Towne Center
Nuclear power is once again a topic of conversation as we consider
alternatives to fossil energy sources. We will discuss the basics of
nuclear power generation and related issues, including waste storage and
processing, health effects of nuclear radiation, security issues and lessons
learned from history.
One of the most difficult problems
in society today is understanding why some people intentionally inflict
emotional and physical pain on others. Such intentional pain occurs not
only on a local level--within families, with "friends," or in work situations,
but also on a national and international scale--witness Hitler's Holocaust,
Stalin's notorious purges, and Chairman Mao's knowing slaughter of tens of
millions. Neuroscience and genetics are providing the potential for a
revolution in our understanding of why "bad" people do what they do.
For years, humans have been introducing and reintroducing plants and animals
into the environment. A live porcupine and peregrine falcon will be used to
discuss the reintroduction projects that these two species have been involved
in. Also, there will be discussion on the control and management of purple
loosestrife and wolves in Michigan.
For some bacteria, it's not simply divide and multiply,
divide and multiply. Instead, they sometimes produce
extraordinarily tough nano-sized particles called spores.
We will talk about why some spores are a threat while others
are quite benign and may, in time, become a key tool in the
field of bionanotechnology.
Recent legal disputes revolving around the patenting of
scientific advances have led to a situation where even the
discussion of certain scientific observations may be
considered patent infringement and subject to persecution.
What is the pivotal discovery that has prompted this
controversy? If we talk about it some attorneys say we are
breaking the law! We will reveal the secret and discuss how
we should balance the need for intellectual property and the
need for free discourse.
How are elements heavier than iron created? Why is there a
difference between the predicted and observed abundance of
elements? What is the precise nature of ultra-dense,
several-tons-in-a-teaspoon neutron stars, which astronomers
know to be among the brightest sources of X-rays in the
universe? The National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory
(NSCL) at Michigan Sate University is one of the world's top
facilities for producing new versions of atomic nuclei. By
everyday standards, this is a construction process on a tiny
scale, a necessary if challenging step in understanding how
small objects on the atomic scale behave. It is a quest
that draws hundreds of researchers each year from around the
world to request a nucleus be built with a certain mixture
of ingredients. What fuels interest in this science?
The polls have consistently shown that between 40 and 45% of
citizens in the USA reject evolutionary science outright,
putting us behind every other industrialized nation and just
ahead of Turkey concerning general acceptance of evolution.
Why is this the case, and just why is it that the
antievolution advocates have had decades of success in
weakening education on this topic?
